|

Bilingual
Education in Colorado: A Disadvantage to English Learners
Trista Harguth
Imagine life as a child in a foreign country, ignorant
of the native language. Not knowing the main language would make
anyone, especially children, feel isolated and secluded. Now, imagine
life as an immigrant child involved in a bilingual education program,
trying hard to learn the language.
The debate about bilingual education has been a
long one. The Bilingual Education Act of 1968 created the first
federal bilingual education policy for non-English speaking students.
In 1974 the United States Supreme Court ruled that identical education
was not equal education for limited-English students, meaning that
teaching every student in English is not giving every student--language
minority students in particular--an equal education, because not
all children can understand English. In today's schools, English
as a Second Language (ESL), Dual Immersion, and bilingual education
are most commonly used. ESL is where English learners (students
who are not fluent in English) are taught mainly in English for
part of the day or the whole day with some native language assistance.
Dual-Language programs instruct in two languages, in order for English
speakers to learn another language and for English learners to learn
English. In Bilingual education, also known as native language instruction,
all or most of the school day is taught in the child's native language
with little English instruction. full
text
|
 |

Editor's
Note:
Karen
Heise
|
|

|
The View
From Here:
Lynne Fukuda
|
 |
Who are
this issue's contributors?
|

Process,
Post-Process and Tradition
Elizabeth K. Haller
Early in the first semester of my teaching career,
I was asked if I adopted a traditional or a non-traditional style
of teaching. At that time not only did I have no idea what the person
meant by "traditional" and "non-traditional,"
but even if I had, I didn't think I had been teaching long enough
to make a fair assessment. I liked the sound of "non-traditional";
therefore, I answered: "I'm not quite sure, but I think I'm
leaning more toward non-traditional."
Now that the semester is drawing to an end, and
I know the meaning of the above terms, I believe I can label myself
as possessing a traditional style of teaching--but somehow, that
just sounds bad. It seems that saying I adopt a traditional style
is the same as saying, "I do not remain open to other options
and choose to cling to the past." However, I am beginning to
change my view. After reading Gary Olson's article, "Toward
a Post-Process Composition: Abandoning the Rhetoric of Assertion,"
I finally have a clearer understanding of what is meant by process
and post-process and believe they are linked to the ideas of traditional
and non-traditional styles of teaching. full
text
|
 |
 
Burned Notebooks
Chris
Shippey
|
|

Poetry:
Eden's
Shadow / The Dark Earth / Baptized in an
April Shower
K.L.
Haley
The flowers are magnificent
in spring.
An iris holds the beauty of a world
Within its purpled majesty, so small.
A tiny flower waves, so swift to bloom,
A star of white upheld on lances green.
And all around, all nature seems to sing...
full
text
|

|
 |
Grist for the Mill: Questions for You |
 |
Call for Papers
|
|
|
Academic Exchange Extra invites
reader responses
to any writings in this issue--especially articles advancing the scholarly
debate of issues raised.
You are invited to join AE Extra staff!
Send your ideas and/or writing sample
to the Editor-in-chief...
Editor-in-chief for Issue 5, 2003:
Karen Heise
University of Northern Colorado (e-mail: kheise2000@yahoo.com)
| |
Copyright © Academic Exchange
- EXTRA
,
Web Editor
Page Created: 27 May 2003 / Updated: --
|
|