| 
Phenomenology:
The Abstract and the Concrete [Symposium Study I Part II]
Dan Lukiv
Phenomenology attempts, in terms of the human
experience, to describe phenomena, which could include a perspective,
various perspectives, appearances, events, actions, changes,
or any occurrence, really, but generally does not attempt
to describe forces that produce such phenomena. Phenomenology
attempts to describe a phenomenon in terms of its essence
with regard to the human experience at hand. Descriptions
could include data from one or a variety of individuals, or
from other appropriate, non-fleshly sources, which could include
literary texts, philosophy texts, art, science, and research.
Phenomenology differs from ontology in that
Phenomenologists concern themselves with what is the essence
of lived experience. Ontologists, on the other hand, concern
themselves with what is reality for the individual. For example,
ontologically, how does the individual see the world
(his or her reality), or parts thereof? Answers to that question
could describe why some researchers tend to do qualitative
research (see, e.g., Wilcke, 2002; Graham, 1997; and Chalip,
Marshall, Thomas, & White, 1998), whereas others tend
to do quantitative research (see, e.g., Savicki, 2000). One
researcher may ask a research question best investigated through
statistical (quantitative) analysis (see, e.g., Boss &
Taylor, 1989). Another researcher may ask a different question
best investigated through hermeneutic phenomenological (qualitative)
analysis (see, e.g., Lukiv, 2002a or 2003a). Doesn't each
research question say something about the researcher
who dreamed them up (Siegle, n.d.a)? full
text >>>
|