|
Developing Language Strategies for English Language Learners Margarita Lara, PhD Luis A. Rosado, PhD Introduction The number of English language learners (ELLs) attending schools in the United States has grown phenomenally, thus posing a challenge for schools and teachers. For example, in 2000-2001, an estimated 4.6 million English language learners were enrolled in public schools in pre-kindergarten through twelfth grade (U.S. Census 2000). In Texas alone, the number of English-language learners identified in 1991-1992 was 331,869 and in 2000-2001, the number increased to 601,791 (U.S. Census 2000). A startling 81.3% growth rate raises an enormous concern of how to meet the needs of ELLs in our public schools. Teachers of ELLs need to be equipped with strategies for teaching English-as-a-second language (ESL), reading, academic literacy, concept attainment, writing and cultural awareness. Garcia (2001) affirms that it is crucial for teachers to select and apply instructional strategies that respect and build on the language and culture of the home. Teachers should also have some background knowledge on research concerning the complexities involved in teaching language and content to ELLs. With a better understanding of these complex processes, teachers of ELLs can support and understand the need to implement strategies that contextualize language and content to maximize students’ literacy development and success in school. Literacy Defined Literacy has traditionally been defined as the ability to read and to write. If we consider how literacy is used in real-life situations, however, it is a function of the interrelationships of listening, speaking, reading and writing. Literacy today also means the ability to read critically, write appropriately, and cope with an increasingly global and technological society. For K-12 ELLs in the United States, literacy is typically defined in terms of academic literacy and includes an explicit emphasis on the ability to demonstrate content understanding through different kinds of assessments in English. Researchers in second language acquisition agree that reading and writing are the most crucial language modes for school success, and that discrete language skills should not be taught in isolation. Ovando, Combs & Collier (2006) are advocates of the current trend for a constructivist and holistic nature language philosophy of learning. The emphasis of language learning is placed on the integration of the four language modes (listening, speaking, reading and writing) and content, fostering personally and academically meaningful language development. The focus of a constructivist philosophy is on the social construction of meaning. Students interact socially and engage in cooperative learning. They engage in literacy development by reading and writing text samples that are experienced-based and meaningful to them. Additionally, they read and write language that is embedded with meaning through a variety of strategies. Thus, students learn to read and write by reading and writing. Biliteracy Defined Thomas and Collier (1997) have developed a model that illustrates the interdependence of four components of language acquisition needed for school success: sociocultural, linguistic, academic, and cognitive (Prism Model). The sociocultural processes are at the heart of the model. This component represents the individual student who is going through the process of acquiring a second language in school. The social and cultural processes occur within the everyday life of the student in varied contexts-home, school, community, and society as well as other personal variables such as self-esteem, anxiety and other affective variables. These sociocultural factors can influence the student’s response to the new language if there’s enough support. However, if the student’s environment is not supportive, it can have a negative influence in the acquisition of L2. Linguistic processes (L1 & L2), a second component of the model, consist of the subconscious aspects of language development (the innate ability all humans possess for acquisition of language), as well as the metalinguistic, conscious, formal teaching of language in school and acquisition of the written system of language. Included in this component are both the oral and written systems of the student’s first and second languages (L1 & L2) across all language domains (phonology, vocabulary, morphology and syntax, semantics, pragmatics, paralinguistic and discourse). Ovando, Combs & Collier (2006) assert that in order to assure cognitive and academic success in a second language, a student’s first language system, oral and written, must be developed to a high cognitive level to allow the transfer of these skills to the second language. Academic Development (L1 & L2), a third component of the model includes all schoolwork in language arts and content areas. Academic knowledge here transfers from L1 to L2. According to Ovando, Combs, & Collier (2006), developing academic work through students’ first language (L1) while teaching the second language (L2) is more efficient than postponing the academic development of ELLs until they acquire sufficient knowledge of the second language to understand content. This kind of approach is commonly used in transitional bilingual education programs to avoid the cognitive retardation that can result from postponing content area instruction until students become proficient in L2. Cognitive Development (L1 & L2), the fourth component of the model, is a natural subconscious process that occurs developmentally from birth to the end of schooling and beyond. Research has shown that students who reach full cognitive development in both L1 & L2 enjoy cognitive advantages over monolinguals (Bialystok, 1988; Bialystok, 1991; Bialystok & Hakuta, 1994). Thus, the Prism Model shows the interdependence of the four components-sociocultural, academic, cognitive, and linguistic in language acquisition. These interrelated components illustrate the influence that sociocultural processes have on the academic, cognitive and linguistic aspects of language acquisition for school success. A high level of acquisition in these four components of the Prism model can ultimately describe a biliterate person who experiences success in school. Although the model appears to be simple enough in print, it’s extremely complex and there are many variables interacting within the four components. Thus, there are some basic statements and principles of developing and promoting biliteracy among ELLs that all teachers need to keep in mind. Although oral language development in L1 is acquired universally with minimal explicit instruction, literacy, on the other hand, is not universally acquired; it requires substantial explicit instruction and practice (Peregoy & Boyle, 2005). Moreover, children’s use and understanding of oral language influences their comprehension of written language. Oral development and language experiences in general are central components of good reading instruction. Research supports the idea that oral language development provides the foundation in phonological awareness and allows for subsequent learning about the alphabetic structure of English (Snow, Burns & Griffin, 1998), which in turn get students children ready to begin reading in L1 and L2. The process of literacy development in the first and second language is similar in both languages (Urzúa, 1987; Hudelson, 1984, 1987); however, there are basic research principles that teachers must take into account when promoting biliteracy among ELLs:
First Language Acquisition/Second Language Acquisition English-language learners (ELLs) who have well-developed literacy skills in their first language (L1) can transfer these skills to the second language—L2 (Collier & Thomas, 1992, Cummins, 1989). According to research, ELLs (depending on the level of proficiency in L1) may take from 5-9 years to acquire academic language needed for school success (Collier & Thomas, 1992). Research also supports the notion that academic knowledge and conceptual development transfer from the students’ first language to their second language. Concepts and skills are taught in the students’ first language while they are in the process of acquiring the second language. Thus, the teaching of academic content does not have to be postponed until literacy in the second language is attained. Reading Development for Native Speakers of English The first step in learning to read English for native English speakers is to learn the relationship between sounds and letters (phoneme awareness and letter-sound knowledge). Thus, the beginning reader must learn the 44 phonemes (sounds) in English and the 26 letters of the alphabet (graphemes). For English speakers, being able to make the connection between sounds and printed forms (alphabetic principle) is a must if they are to develop accurate decoding skills and reading fluency (speed). In addition, they must have knowledge of word meanings (vocabulary), text comprehension, written expression, spelling and handwriting, and the motivation to read. Furthermore, teachers must conduct continuous assessment of developing readers to ensure success in reading. The acquisition of reading and writing are complex processes for native English speakers, just imagine the complexity of these processes for ELLs. Reading for English Language Learners (ELLs) For ELLs, the English sound system becomes problematic, in particular, for those students who are not literate in their first language (L1). There are multiple sounds in the English language that pose a problem for ELLs. If children cannot perceive the sounds in spoken words, they will have difficulty in “sounding out” or decoding words accurately. The problem is compounded by the fact that in addition to developing literacy skills, ELLs must acquire content knowledge and content area literacy. Furthermore, ELLs encounter more problems in that each content area is unique with its own set of terminology, writing conventions and critical thinking skills that are a must if the student is to become proficient in the English language (National Clearing House for English Language Acquisition, NCELA, 2006). Strategies to Support ELLs The complexity of learning a second language can be minimized with the use of developmentally appropriate and effective strategies to teach ELLs. This part of the article provides strategies to modify basal readers and content area textbooks for beginning, intermediate and advanced English language learners. The strategies for each level of English proficiency are divided into the following language modes—listening/speaking and reading/writing. Strategies are defined as techniques that teachers and students use to bring meaning and purpose to language activities. The strategies presented can be used interchangeably from one level of English proficiency to another by contextualizing the strategy, thus making the instructional input comprehensible. ELLs need a variety of strategies to comprehend the complex English language system. The strategies presented in this chapter have been adapted from numerous researchers in the field of second language acquisition (Celcia-Murcia & McIntosh, 1979; Chamot & O’Malley, 1987; Echevarria & Graves, 2002; Jiménez, García, & Pearson, 1996; Mora, 2001a, Thonis, 1981, Tinajero & Ada, 2003). Several strategies for establishing and creating a positive, nurturing, and supportive environment for effective language development to occur are also discussed. Providing a Supportive Environment for ELLs It is important to keep in mind that learning a second language can be very intimidating for students who come to school with a language other than English. The students must feel comfortable in their new environment. Teachers must provide a positive, nurturing, and supportive classroom environment that is stress free in order for natural language development to occur. The teacher must establish oral/aural routines that support and nurture students’ second language acquisition. They must also focus on oral communication that is clear and concise. Teachers may use prompts, cues, facial expressions, body language, visual aids (charts, pictures, books, word walls) and concrete materials to reinforce oral and written comprehension. The teacher may assign the ELL an English-speaking buddy for helping with instructions, classroom routines and procedures and cooperative learning activities. The classroom environment must be print rich with charts, word walls, and many books of interest for students at all levels of language development. More importantly, teachers should use many varied strategies for developing ELLs’ listening/speaking and reading/writing language skills. Some strategies for developing skills in listening/speaking and reading/writing for beginning ELLs are presented below. Strategies for Beginning Learners Listening/Speaking Strategies Students at the beginning level of language development have minimal to limited comprehension in the second language. Consequently, teachers must immerse the students in oral language and model appropriate pronunciation, intonation, rhythm, word stress, pace, fluency and above all, meaning. Many strategies are available for developing listening/speaking skills for ELLs.
Reading/Writing Strategies for Beginning ELLs Many of the strategies for developing oral language can also be used in teaching beginning reading for ELLs. To promote reading development, teachers should model reading to the students daily and use the following strategies.
Strategies for Intermediate Learners Students at the intermediate level of language development have good comprehension. Lessons continue to enhance receptive vocabulary and activities are designed to develop higher levels of language use. Strategies for this level of language acquisition and content area learning contextualize the academic language needed for school success. Listening/Speaking
Reading/Writing Conduct pre-reading discussions of the topic, allow students to read cooperatively, focus on higher level reading comprehension questions rather than on recall. In developing the academic and technical vocabulary for the different content areas (science, mathematics, social studies, and literature), provide context to assist comprehension and by all means, do not teach vocabulary as word lists. Students retain vocabulary and concepts best when they are given varied and extensive opportunities to develop concepts in meaningful situations. Additionally, look for the same content in another medium (movie, filmstrip, tape). Reading and writing activities should be incorporated into all content area lessons.
Strategies for Advanced Learners Students at the advanced level of language development are near proficient in oral activities. Students can understand and comprehend complex sentences, however, they need more practice and experiences with the written language. Again, many of the activities used at the intermediate level can be modified for advanced English learners. Listening/Speaking
Reading/Writing
Conclusion This article presented a variety of strategies that can be used in modifying and contextualizing basal readers and content area material for beginning, intermediate and advanced ELLs. The strategies were divided into listening/speaking and reading/writing language modes. Research on literacy, biliteracy, first and second language acquisition, oral language and reading and the teaching of reading to native and non-native speakers of English was briefly discussed. The purpose of the research presented was to provide teachers with background knowledge in understanding the complexity of ELLs’ acquisition of academic skills needed for school success. Additionally, the strategies presented will provide teachers with tools for teaching listening/speaking and reading/writing skills in meaningful, contextual, and varied social/linguistic settings. It was continuously emphasized throughout the chapter for teachers of ELLs to model the strategies, allowing the students to see the step-by-step processes used in effective speaking, reading and writing. Based on research presented, teachers of ELLs may develop second language skills while teaching content knowledge. Furthermore, the initial focus of literacy should be on meaningful, authentic and natural uses of language. The goal in teaching language skills and academic content for ELLs should be “lifelong biliteracy for all”. References Asher, J. (1982). Learning another language through actions: The complete teacher’s guidebook (2nd ed.). Los Gatos, CA: Sky Oaks Productions. Bialystok, E. (1988). Levels of bilingualism and levels of linguistic awareness. Developmental Psychology. 24, 560-567. Bialystok, E. (1991). Language Processing in Bilingual Children. Boston: Cambridge University Press. Bialystok, E. & Hakuta, K. (1994). In Other Words. New York: Basic Books. Celcia-Murcia, M. & McIntosh, L. (1979). Teaching English as a second language. Massachusetts: Newbury House. Chamot, A.U. & O’Malley, M.J. (1987). CALLA: The cognitive academic language learning approach: A bridge to the mainstream. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 227-249. Collier, V. & Thomas, W. (1992). A synthesis of studies examining long-term language minority student data on academic achievement. Bilingual Research Journal, 16(1-2), 187-212. Cummins, J. (1981). The role of primary language development in promoting educational success of minority students. In California State Department of Education (Ed.), Schooling and language minority students: A theoretical framework (pp. 3-49). Los Angeles: Evaluation, Dissemination and Assessment Center, California State University. Cummins, J. (1989). Empowering minority students. Sacramento, Los Angeles, CA: California Association for Bilingual Education. Echevarria, J., & Graves, A. (2002). Sheltered content instruction: Teaching English language learners with diverse abilities, 2nd ed. Boston, MA: Pearson. Garcia, E. E. (2001). Hispanic education in the United States: Raices y alas. Lanham: MD. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. Hudelson, S. (1984). Kan yo ret an rayt en ingles: Children becoming literate in English as a second language. TESOL Quarterly, 18, 221-238. Hudelson, S. (1987). The role of native language literacy in the education of language minority children. Language Arts, 64, 827-841. Jiménez, R.T., García, G.E., & Person, P.D. (1996). The reading strategies of bilingual Latina/o students who are successful English readers: Opportunities and obstacles. Reading Research Quarterly, 33 (1), 90-112. Mora, J. D. (2001a). Effective instructional practices and assessment for literacy and biliteracy development. In S. R. Hurley & J.V. Tinajero (Eds.) Literacy Assessment of Second Language Learners (pp. 149-166). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon. National Clearing House for English Language Acquisition –NCELA (2006). Resources about English language literacy, academic language, and content area literacy. Retrieved on April 15, 2006, from http://www.ncela.gwu.edu/resabout/literacy Ovando, C. J., Combs, M.C., & Collier, V.P. (2006). Bilingual and ESL classrooms: Teaching in multicultural classrooms (4th ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw Hill. Peregoy, S. F., & Boyle, W. F. (2005). Reading, writing, and learning in ESL: A resource book Snow, C., Burns, S., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children: Executive summary. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Retrieved April 27, 2006, from http://www.ed.gov/inits/americareads/ReadDiff/read-sum.html Thomas, W. P., & Collier, V. P. (1997). School effectiveness for language minority students. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education. Thonis, E. (1981). Reading instruction for language minority students. In Schooling and language minority students (pp.147-81). Sacramento, CA: California Department of Education. Tinajero, J.V. & Ada. A.F. (1993). The Power of two languages: Literacy and biliteracy for Spanish-speaking students. New York: Macmillan/McGraw-Hill. Tragar, B., & Wong, B. K. (1984). The relationship between native and second language reading and second language oral ability. In C. Rivera (Ed.), Placement procedures in bilingual education: Education and policy issues (pp. 152-164). Clevedon, England: Multicultural Matters. U.S. Census, (October, 2002). U.S. Department of Education’s Survey of the States; Limited English Proficient Students and Available Educational Programs and Services. Retrieved on March 12, 2006, from http://www.census.gov Urzúa, C. (1987). “You stopped too soon”: Second language children composing and revising. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 279-305.
You are invited to join AE Extra staff! Academic Exchange Extra invites reader response to any writings in this issue--especially articles advancing the scholarly debate of issues raised. |